检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈继灵 CHEN Ji-ling(Suzhou University Wangjian School of Law,Suzhou215006,China)
出 处:《天水行政学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》2018年第2期114-118,共5页Journal of Tianshui College of Administration
摘 要:从超生罚款到社会抚养费,名称的改变并未改变该制度的实质,各地有别的具体措施更引发了对该制度的冲击。不论是民间俗称的"超生罚款"还是官方宣称的"对社会的补偿",社会抚养费都很难在性质上自圆其说。随着全面放开"二孩",取消社会抚养费的法理基础和社会基础都已具备,取消社会抚养费便顺理成章。From the over-birth fine to the social maintenance fees,the change of the name has not changed the essence of the system,and there are other specific measures in different places which have caused the impact on the system. Whether it is a folk custom called "over-birth fine" or the official claim of "compensation for the society",social maintenance fees is difficult to say in nature. With the universal two-child policy,the legal basis and social basis of the abolition of social maintenance fees have been provided,and the abolition of social support is logical.
分 类 号:D922.182[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49