检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘小春[1] 陈伟清[1] 郑国富[1] 谢海亮 叶波[1] 陈革[2] Liu Xiaochun;Chen Weiqing;Zheng Guofu;Xie Hailiang;Ye Bo;Chen Ge(Second Department of General Surgery, The Affiliated Ganzhou Hospital of Nanchang University, Jiangxi 341000, China;Department of Abdominal Wall Hernia Surgery, Shanghai Huadong Hospital, Shanghai 200040, China)
机构地区:[1]赣州市人民医院普外二科,江西省341000 [2]复旦大学附属华东医院疝和腹壁外科,上海200040
出 处:《中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版)》2018年第2期131-134,共4页Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition)
摘 要:目的总结开放式腹膜前修补40例股疝的手术效果。方法回顾性分析2014年5月至2016年12月,赣州市人民医院接受手术40例股疝的临床资料,其中急诊股疝组27例,择期股疝组13例。结果择期组中疝囊内容物8例为网膜,4例为积液,1例为小肠;急诊组中内容物为肠管的26例,1例为单纯嵌顿网膜。13例择期组和13例急诊组患者进行了经腹膜前使用补片修补,另14例急诊组患者进行了Mcvay法组织的缝合修补;急诊组中有6例进行了肠切除肠吻合。择期组中早期并发症为3例次,急诊组为24例次,2组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);2组的平均住院时间分别为(6.615±1.321)d和(7.777±2.206)d,平均手术时间分别(77.692±22.695)min和(94.211±13.927)min,2组比较差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05);随访过程中26例补片修补的患者均未发生补片感染;补片修补的无复发病例,急诊组缝合修补的出现1例复发。结论开放式腹膜前无张力补片疝修补术是一种安全和可供选择的治疗择期股疝和部分急诊股疝的手术方式;但急诊手术的早期并发症较择期手术多,建议尽可能在择期状态下对股疝进行手术治疗。Objective To summarize the effect of open preperitoneal repair in 40 cases of femoral hernia. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 40 cases of femoral hernia in Ganzhou People’s Hospital from May 2014 to December 2016, including 27 emergency cases and 13 elective cases. Results In the elective group, the contents were 8 cases of omentum, 4 cases of hydrops, and 1 case of small intestine. In the emergency group, there were 26 cases of intestinal and 1 case of incarcerated omentum. 13 elective cases and 13 emergency cases received the preperitoneal mesh repair, and the other 14 emergency cases were perfomed with the suture repair following the Mcvay method. In the emergency group, 6 cases underwent intestinal excision. 3 elective cases and 24 emergency cases developed early complications, and the difference was statistically significant. The operation time was(94.211±13.927 min) and the length of stay was(7.777±2.206 d) in the emergency group, were longer than elective cases of(77.692±22.695 min) and(6.615±1.321 d), both had statistical significance; No mesh infection and no recurrence were found in mesh group in the follow-up duration, while there was one emergency case in suture group occurred. Conclusion Open preperitoneal mesh repair is a safe and optional procedure for the treatment of selective and some emergency femoral hernia. However, the early complication of the femoral hernia in the emergency cases was more than that in the selective cases. So we suggest that surgical treatment of femoral hernia should be performed at the time of selection as far as possible.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38