出版机构科研不端追责论要  

An Overview on Publishing Agencies' Responsibility Nvestigation on Misconduct in Scientific Research

作　　者：董兴佩 傅游 DONG Xing-pei;FU You(Editorial Department of Journal of SUST, Shandong University of Science and Technology,Qingdao 266590, Chin)

机构地区：[1]山东科技大学学报编辑部,山东青岛266590

出　　处：《科技与法律》2017年第4期77-85,共9页Science Technology and Law

摘　　要：出版机构实施的科研不端追责权属于民事权利。基于此,出版合同可以为科研不端追责提供具有法律约束力的追责依据;弥补法律政策文件对科研不端行为及其种类界定的疏漏;赋予出版机构调查取证权并防范证据法律风险。同时,出版机构追责权是一种强势主体的民事权利,为防止权利滥用于学术,出版机构行使追责权应该对自身活动予以限制。科研不端行为的调查和决定活动应该遵循正当程序原则,同时科研不端责任追究必须贯彻无侵权无违约即无追责原则,不端行为与责任相适应原则,教育为主、追责为辅原则,比例原则,保障科研不端嫌疑人救济权利原则等。The right of publishing agencies to investigate the responsibility for scientific researchmisconduct belongs to civil rights. Based on this, the publishing agreement can provide a legally bindingaccountability basis for research misconduct, making up for the omission of legal regulation on the definition ofscientific misconduct and its category, giving the publishing agencies the right to investigate and obtain evidenceand preventing the legal risk of evidence. At the same time, the publishing agencies＇ right to blame is a kind ofcivil rights by a strong subject. To prevent the abuse of academic rights, the publishers should limit their ownactivities when exercising the right to blame. The investigation and decision-making activities on scientificresearch misconduct should follow the principle of due procedure, while the accusing of scientific researchmisconduct must implement the principle of no research misconduct if there is no infringement and no violationof contracts, the principle of switing responsibility to misconduct, the principle of giving priority to educationand punishing as auxiliary, the principle of proportionality and the principle of protecting the right of relief ofmisconduct suspects, and so on.

关 键 词：科研不端行为 出版机构 科研不端追责权 正当程序 追责原则 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]