航次租船合同仲裁条款并入提单有效性的认定标准  

Standards of Incorporation of Arbitration Clause Under Voyage CP by Reference into Bill of Lading

作　　者：高升[1] 曾祥军 GAO Sheng;ZENG Xiangjun(College of Humanities and Lazy, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingclao 266590, Chin)

机构地区：[1]山东科技大学文法学院,山东青岛266590

出　　处：《山东科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2018年第3期55-64,共10页Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)

摘　　要：航次租船合同仲裁条款并入提单并对提单持有人有效得到了包括世界海事大国在内的越来越多国家的支持,但各国的认定标准各有不同。以英国为典型代表的国家要求提单中须以明确措辞表达仲裁合意;以美国为主要代表的国家则规定提单中须标明特定航次租船合同且提单持有人了解并入事实。我国作为海事大国至今并没有形成统一的有关航次租船合同仲裁条款并入提单有效性的认定标准,我国在认定航次租船合同仲裁条款并入提单有效性时,须要求在提单的正面标明特定航次租船合同仲裁条款并入提单且并入措辞明确表达仲裁条款并入提单。The arbitration clause of Voyage CP is valid for the holder of the bill of lading if the arbitration clause is incorporated into the bill of landing. This theory is supported by more and more countries including important maritime powers, but different coun- ties have different standards. In the case of the representative of the United Kingdom, the bill of lading must be clearly worded to express the intention to arbitrate. In the case of the United States as the main representative, the bill of lading should be marked with the specific charter party and the holder of the bill of lading knows the facts of the incorporation. As a powerful maritime country, China still has no standard on this issue. When determining the validity of the bill of lading, China requires that the voy- age be marked on the front of the bill of lading and incorporation clause must be clearly worded to put the charter party arbitration clause into the bill of lading.

关 键 词：租船合同 仲裁条款 并入提单 认定标准 

分 类 号：DF961.9[政治法律—国际法学]