城市公共资源配置与家庭住房投资——基于CSS(2006—2015)五轮调查数据的研究  

Urban Public Resource Allocation and Household Housing Asset Investment: Research Based on the China Social Survey(2006-2015)

作　　者：杨小科[1] 王晶[2] 

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院研究生院 [2]中国社会科学院社会学研究所

出　　处：《公共行政评论》2018年第2期73-89,191,共17页Journal of Public Administration

摘　　要：利用"中国社会状况综合调查"2006—2015年五轮调查数据,从两个视角分析城镇家庭住房资产投资的驱动力量:一是检验资本增值的驱动;二是检验公共品改善的驱动。通过数据分析发现,过去10年间中国城镇家庭确实存在着资本增值的利益驱动。两类家庭资本增值的驱动最强:一类是低收入、高风险偏好的家庭;另一类是高收入、高风险偏好的家庭。从公共品对家庭住房投资的影响看,社区基础设施是提升人们住房投资驱动的重要因素,随着人们对地方义务教育和医疗卫生服务水平评价的提升,人们投资于住房的动机倾向逐渐提升。从长期来看,城市政府需不断改善城镇公共产品的均衡配置,切实保障中低收入阶层优质教育、医疗服务的可得性。The paper analyzes the driving forces of housing asset investment in urban households using the Chinese Social Survey 2006-2015 dataset. The analyses focus on testing these driving forces from two perspectives: capital appreciation and the improvement of public goods. Based on an analysis of 10 years' worth of data,China's urban families are among the capital-driven interests. Two income groups have the highest capital-driven interests: low-income,high-risk preference families and high-income,high-risk preference families. As for the impact of public goods on household housing investment,community infrastructure was an important factor in reducing the amount of housing investment. As opinions of local compulsory education and health serviceimproved,the tendency to invest in housing gradually decreased. In the long run,urban governmentsshould constantly improve the allocation of urban public goods,and effectively guarantee the availability of high quality education and medical services to middle-and low-income citizens.

关 键 词：住房资产 风险偏好 居住分割 公共品配置 

分 类 号：D63[政治法律—政治学]