检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张浩[1] 俞小炯[1] Zhang Hao;Y-u Xiaojiong.(Sichuan Provincial Academy of Medical Sciences · Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu , Sichuan 610072, China)
机构地区:[1]四川省医学科学院.四川省人民医院,四川成都610072
出 处:《四川医学》2018年第4期404-408,共5页Sichuan Medical Journal
摘 要:目的探讨经皮微波消融治疗复发性小肝细胞肝癌的近期疗效比较。方法收集同期经皮微波消融和再次肝切除治疗复发性小肝细胞性肝癌的临床资料,比较相关临床指标。结果两组病例在年龄、性别、Child-Pugh分级、肝硬化、肿瘤个数及术后复发时间等方面均无统计学差异(均P>0.05)。微波消融组术后下床时间、进食时间、疼痛评分和术后住院天数指标,均好于再次肝切除组(均P<0.05)。微波消融组术后并发症发生少,不增加严重并发症发生率。两组病例术后无瘤生存率(χ~2=0.001,P=0.975)及累积生存率(χ~2=0.090,P=0.764)比较无统计学差异。结论经皮微波消融可作为复发性小肝细胞肝癌的首选治疗方式,是一种安全、有效的方法。Objective To investigate the short-term efficacy of percutaneous microwave ablation in the treatment of recurrent small hepatocellular carcinoma.Methods We collected the clinical data of simultaneous percutaneous microwave ablation and rehepatectomy in the treatment of recurrent small hepatocellular carcinoma and compared the relevant clinical indicators.Results There was no significant difference in age,sex and Child-Pugh grade,liver cirrhosis,tumor number and recurrence time between the two groups( all P〈0. 05).After operation,the time of getting out of bed,feeding time,pain score and postoperative hospitalization in microwave ablation group were better than those in rehepatectomy group( all P〈0. 05). In microwave ablation group,the incidence of postoperative complications was less,and the incidence of severe complications was not increased.There was no statistical difference between the two groups in tumor free survival rate(χ~2 = 0. 001,P = 0. 975) and cumulative survival rate(χ~2 = 0. 090,P =0. 764).Conclusion Percutaneous microwave ablation can be the first choice for the treatment of recurrent small hepatocellular carcinoma,which is a safe and effective method.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.235.50