检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:鲁珊[1] 肖荷霞[1] 毛彩云[1] 陆建章[1] 岳金生[1] LU Shan;XIAO He-xia;MAO Cai-yun;LU Jian-zhang;YUE Jin-sheng(Cangzhou Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Cangzhou 061001, China)
出 处:《黑龙江农业科学》2018年第4期13-15,共3页Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences
摘 要:为探索适宜沧州生态类型区的玉米、大豆间作种植模式,通过玉米、大豆间作4∶4种植模式与常规玉米单作种植模式的田间比较试验,研究其产量与经济效益。结果表明:间作模式玉米平均产量7 605kg·hm^(-2),大豆平均产量1 530kg·hm^(-2),玉米单作平均产量8 280kg·hm^(-2),间作综合产量比单作增产10.32%,平均增收节支约8 250元·hm^(-2),玉米、大豆间作经济效益较玉米单作显著提高,为当地玉米、大豆间作套种技术的推广提供理论依据。The yield and economic benefits were studied through field comparison experiment of maize and soybean intercropping with 4-4-size row planting mode and conventional maize single cropping in order to explore the maize and soybean intercropping patterns suitable for cangzhou ecological type area.The experimental results showed that the average yield of maize was 7 605 kg·hm^(-2),and the average yield of soybean was1 530 kg·hm^(-2) in intercropping mode,while the average yield maize was 8 280 kg·hm^(-2) in maize monoculture mode.The output of intercropping comprehensive yield was 10.32% higher than that of the monoculture,and the average cutbacks was about 8 250 yuan·hm^(-2).The economic benefit of maize and soybean intercropping was significantly higher than that of maize monoculture,which was provided a theoretical basis for the promotion of local maize and soybean intercropping technology.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28