南北朝正史的时代关注异同比较——以有无《食货志》为例  

Comparison of Attention to Reality in the Official Historiography during Northern and Southern Dynasties——With or without " Shihuo Zhi"

作　　者：卢鹏程 LU Peng-cheng(College of Politics and Public Administration, Shandong Youth University of Political Science, Jinan 250103, China)

机构地区：[1]山东青年政治学院政治与公共管理学院,山东济南250103

出　　处：《内蒙古大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2018年第2期90-93,共4页Journal of Inner Mongolia University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

摘　　要：南北朝时期三部正史中仅《魏书》专列《食货志》。比较《宋书》《魏书》作者撰史旨趣,可以发现南北双方史家都认识到了史著记载中"食货"部分对国计民生的重要性。沈约《宋书》无《食货志》,应是当时流传史著中已有涉及,并非沈约等南朝史家史识不足。除了《食货志》的专门记载以外,经济史资料更多呈现为南北朝正史纪传篇章中的零散分布。这是因为纪传体正史撰写体例主要以人物叙事为主,同时又体现了史家保存事关国计民生内容的自觉意识。Shihuo Zhi is only in Wei Shu in the three official historiography during Northern and Southern Dynasties. By comparing the authors＇ intentions of Song Shu and Wei Shu can be found on the importance of records of shihuo with national economy and people＇s livelihood in both north and South. There is no Shihuo Zhi in Song Shu,not because of the lack of knowledge of historian,but because they have been involved by predecessors. Besides Shihuo Zhi,economic history was scattered in these books. Characters in narrative is the main subject in the official historiography,and it also embodies the historian consciousness of saving records about national economy and people＇s livelihood.

关 键 词：《宋书》 《魏书》 《食货志》 史学比较 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]