接受语境下经典作家传奇——从萧红的《生死场》谈起  

Legend of Xiao Hong as Classic Writer in the Perspective of Acceptance Context:An Analysis of The Field of Life and Death

作　　者：王金茹[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]<吉林师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)> [2]吉林大学文学院

出　　处：《吉林大学社会科学学报》2018年第3期193-202,208,共10页Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：吉林省社会科学基金项目(2016B238)

摘　　要：萧红及其作品的接受历史充满喧嚣与歧义,在中国现代文学研究领域算是一个异数。对于作家萧红来说,她在接受主体(读者)那里所产生的反响,与其作品的接受效果并非完全相同。接受萧红先于接受《生死场》,是萧红接受史所呈现出的一个突出特点。另一特点是名人效应助推了萧红的成名与传播。鲁迅与胡风对《生死场》的经典定位,不仅指导了当年读者对这部作品的理解与接受,而且对后世研究者也产生了深远影响,甚至造成了某种遮蔽。经典作家及其作品的接受并非一帆风顺,在经典化过程中作家的艺术生命和文化影响丰满于多元理解。There are various disputes and ambiguities in the research and acceptance of Xiao Hong and her w ork,w hich can be seemed as an oddity in the study of modern Chinese literature.Based on the process of acceptance of The Field of Life and Death,this article aims to analyze the cause of ups and downs in the whole process and attempts to figure out her canonization of being a classical writer.It can be concluded that as a writer,the acceptance of her The Field of Life and Death is quite later than the acceptance of Xiao Hong herself as a celebrity.The effect of celebrity leads to the success of Xiao Hong,but it makes some obstacles as well.The acceptance of classical writers and their work is not always smooth.In the process of being classics,the image of the writer is much more important than the meta-cognition of the work.

关 键 词：萧红 《生死场》 接受史 文本传播 经典 经典化 

分 类 号：I207.42[文学—中国文学]