我国古代体育人身伤害的类型与治理研究  

Research on Types and Treatment of Physical Injury in Sports in Ancient China

作　　者：戴羽[1] 曹景川[2] DAI Yu;CAO Jing-chuan(History and Tourism Culture College, Shanxi Normal University, Linfen 041004, China;Sports College, Shanxi Normal University, Linfen 041004, China)

机构地区：[1]山西师范大学历史与旅游文化学院,山西临汾041004 [2]山西师范大学体育学院,山西临汾041004

出　　处：《体育文化导刊》2018年第5期124-129,共6页Sports Culture Guide

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(15BTY076)

摘　　要：采用文献资料法分析我国古代体育人身伤害的类型、治理措施及特点。主要结论:我国古代体育人身伤害类型主要包括弹射伤害、对抗性运动伤害、水上运动伤害和车马伤害。自《唐律疏议》始,我国历代法典以"过失杀伤""戏杀伤"和"斗杀伤"等罪名治理体育人身伤害,立法逻辑清晰,层级明确。体育人身伤害赔偿方面,元代实行"烧埋银"制度后,"赎罚分离"确立了独立的赔偿救济机制。与古代西方运动伤害治理相较,我国古代体育人身伤害用刑较重,不承认自甘风险,这也使运动伤害高发的体育项目始终处于法律制裁的阴影下,其发展受到较大制约。Adopting research methods of literature review, this paper analyzes types, measures and characteristics of physical injury in sports in ancient China. The types mainly include slingshot and archery injury, adversarial injury, water sports injury and vehicles and horses injury. Since Tang Code, the ancient codes in China had been managed physical injury by the crimes of ＂killing of negligence＂ ＂killing of play＂ ＂killing of fighting＂ and so on, and the legislative logic and level was clear. In the area of compensation for physical injury in sports, after the system of ＂fine for funeral expenses＂ in Yuan Dynasty, independent compensation remedy mechanism has been established. Compared with the management of sports injury in ancient western, the law of physical injuries was strict in ancient China and didn＇t recognize the assumption of risk, which made the risk sports always under the shadow of legal sanctions, and had been greatly restricted in development.

关 键 词：体育史 古代体育 体育人身伤害 法律治理 

分 类 号：G812.9[文化科学—体育学]