检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:罗大佳[1] Luo Dajia(The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Chin)
机构地区:[1]安徽医科大学第二附属医院,安徽合肥230601
出 处:《中外女性健康研究》2018年第9期102-103,共2页Women's Health Research
摘 要:目的:观察两种不同雾化吸入方式治疗婴幼儿急性支气管肺炎的效果。方法:将180例急性支气管肺炎的患儿随机分为两组。两组患儿均给予常规综合治疗,对照组在常规综合治疗的基础上给予电动雾化吸入治疗,观察组在常规综合治疗的基础上给予氧驱动雾化吸入治疗。结果:观察组在显效率、总有效率、临床体征改善等方面均显著优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:氧驱动雾化吸入治疗婴幼儿急性支气管肺炎疗效明显,对患儿刺激性小,患儿耐受性好。Objective:To compare the different curative effects in the atomizing inhalation therapy with infant bronchopneumonia. Methods: 180 infant patients with acute bronchopneumonia were randomly divided into two groups. The two groups were taken same general clinical therapy. Besides that, the neonatal patients in control group used electrically driven atomizing inhalation for treatment, and the infant patients in experimental group used oxygen driven atomizing inhalation. Results: The significant efficiency, the total efficiency and the improvement in clinical symptom in experimental group were significantly more effective than control group( P 〈 0.05). Conclusion: The oxygen driven atomizing inhalation is more effective in infant bronchopneumonia. And there is little amyctic and more compliance in infant patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222