临床医学研究论文中常见的真实性学术不端问题及其对策  

Academic misconduct about the facticity in the medical clinical research articles and the countermeasures

作　　者：郭盛楠[1] 齐淑兰[1] 王晓红[1] 杨立丽[1] 朱琦[1] 孟醒[1] GUO Shengnan;QI Shulan;WANG Xiaohong;YANG Lili;ZHU Qi;MENG Xing(Journal Center, No. 16 Nanxiaojie, Dongzhlmen Nei, 100700, Beijing, China)

机构地区：[1]中国中医科学院针灸研究所期刊中心,北京100700

出　　处：《编辑学报》2018年第2期174-177,共4页Acta Editologica

基　　金：中国科学技术期刊编辑学会基金项目(2017QNB11);中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金资助(ZZ16008)

摘　　要：临床医学研究论文中常见的真实性学术不端问题常存在于受试者、干预措施、疗效指标、统计学处理和研究方案这几个方面。编辑可以通过向作者索要原始数据;从文章整体及宏观的角度入手,注意写作的严谨性和逻辑的缜密性;重视同行评议专家意见,必要时可请多位专家对论文进行评审;核查投稿系统中作者的基本信息等方式协助判断研究的真实性。若遇到涉及真实性的学术不端问题,可参考出版伦理委员会中的具体流程处理。In the medical clinical research articles,the academic misconduct about the facticity may appear in participants,interventions,outcomes,statistics and the study schemes. Editors can evaluate the facticity of the studies through the following ways：asking raw data from the authors; paying attention to the preciseness and the logic from the whole article and the general idea; focusing on the peer reviews and invite a number of the experts to evaluate; and checking the basic information from the submission system. We can consult to the Committee on Publication Ethics if we meet the problems related to the academic misconduct about the facticity.

关 键 词：临床研究 真实性 学术不端 对策 

分 类 号：G232[文化科学]