检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吕鑫[1,2]
机构地区:[1]浙江工业大学法学院 [2]浙江工业大学福利与法治研究中心
出 处:《浙江社会科学》2018年第5期41-49,共9页Zhejiang Social Sciences
基 金:2017年司法部课题<慈善资格认定的原理与规则研究>(17SFB5002)
摘 要:法律所追求的基本价值是正义,而促进分配正义则是慈善法的基本价值。这不仅体现在慈善法的产生上,其与济贫法构建了最早的社会福利制度;而且还体现在慈善法的演进中,其通过解决慈善的资格问题和执行问题,推动了基于慈善的财产再分配,进而促进了分配正义。而如若基于分配正义之视角审视我国的《慈善法》,可以发现不仅其资格问题仍然有待解决,需要构建以公益原则为核心的界定模式,以此认定具有促进公共利益(福利)之价值的慈善,而且其执行问题也并未解决,需要建立专门的监管机构以履行对非法行为的监督职责和对合法行为的促进职权,并尽可能确保慈善捐赠及其设立信托和开展募捐等活动的合法性。The core value pursued by law is justice, while the core value of charity law is promoting distributive justice. It is reflected not only in the legislation of the charity law which constructs the earliest social welfare system together with the poor law, but also in the evolution of the charity law which promotes the redistribution based on the charity by solving the qualification and implementation issues of the charity. If looking on the charity law of China on perspective of the distributive justice, it is not hard to find that not only the qualification issues remain to be resolved and a definition pattern in core of the public benefit needs to be built, but also the implementation issues wait to be resolved and a specialize regulatory agency needs to be established to supervising the illegal acts as well as promoting the lawful acts to ensure the legality of charitable donation, charitable trust and charitable solicitation.
分 类 号:D922.182.3[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.90