《献给爱米丽的玫瑰》与《橙血》中的主仆形象对比研究  

A comparative study of the images of the mistresses and menservants in A Rose for Emilyand and The Blood from Navel Orange

作　　者：刘珊 LIU Shan(Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350002 Chin)

机构地区：[1]福州大学至诚学院,福建福州350002

出　　处：《新余学院学报》2018年第2期87-91,共5页Journal of Xinyu University

摘　　要：福克纳和严歌苓来自不同的时代和族裔,但他们塑造的两对异族主仆:爱米丽和托比、玛丽和阿贤却有不少相似处。前者即爱米丽和玛丽是具有强烈控制欲、性压抑且遵循暴力死亡哲学的白人女主人;后者托比和阿贤是来自弱势族裔、缺乏阳刚气概的男仆。结合弗洛伊德关于潜意识和本能的理论对这两对主仆的形象特点进行了对比分析,阐释了这两对人物形象的异同点,揭示了表面的主仆关系背后所蕴含的对种族权力关系的深层解构意义。Though William Faulkner and Geling Yan belong to different times and ethnic groups,the figures of the mistresses and menservants they created in their short stories shared some similarities.Both the white mistresses,Emily and Marie,are subject to a strong desire of controlling,sexual repression and death instinct,while their menservants,Tobe and A-Xian,who are from ethnic minorities are men lacking of masculinity.This paper intends to compare and analyze the characterization of these two pairs of mistresses and menservants by employing Feud＇s theories about subconsciousness and death instinct.It aims to interpret the differences and similarities between the two pairs of characters and reveal the deconstruction effect on the ethnic power relation behind the apparent relationship between the masters and servants.

关 键 词：主仆形象 潜意识 死的本能 爱米丽 《橙血》 

分 类 号：I106.4[文学—世界文学]