检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱琴[1] 颜巧元[2] ZHU Qin;YAN Qiaoyuan
机构地区:[1]华中科技大学同济医学院护理学院,武汉市430030 [2]华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院护理部,武汉市430030
出 处:《中华护理杂志》2018年第5期587-591,共5页Chinese Journal of Nursing
基 金:湖北省卫生与计划生育委员会基金项目(WJ2017M100)
摘 要:目的构建患者参与患者安全(Patients for Patient Safety,PFPS)质量评价指标体系,以期为患者参与自身安全工作的实施与管理提供借鉴。方法采用文献研究法、专家小组讨论法、德尔菲法及百分权重法筛选指标并确定指标权重,确立PFPS质量评价指标体系。结果两轮问卷的回收率分别为88.46%、84.62%,专家权威系数分别为0.870、0.858。两轮咨询后,各级指标的变异系数为0~0.213,协调系数W为0.429,最终形成的PFPS质量评价指标体系包含一级指标6个,二级指标9个,三级指标26个。结论 PFPS质量评价指标体系制订方法可靠,可操作性强,为评价医院患者参与自身安全工作提供了科学的测评工具。Objective To develop a scientific and practical index system to evaluate service quality of patients for patient safety. Methods Using literature research method,expert group discussion,Delphi method and percentage weight method to determine the index system. Results For two rounds of surveys,the recovery rate of questionnaire was 88.46% and 84.62%,respectively; the authority coefficients were 0.837 and 0.842,respectively. In the second round,variation coefficients of each item ranged from 0 to 0.213,and coefficient coordination were 0.429. The index system consisted of 6 first-level indexes,9 second-level indexes and 26 third-level indexes. Conclusion A scientific and reliable index system to evaluate service quality of patients for patient safety was developed,which provides a scientific assessment tool for the evaluation of service quality of patients for patient safety.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229