检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:任鹏[1] 姚强[2] 张竞超[1] 张耀光 Ren Peng,et al.(Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, P. R. Chin)
机构地区:[1]天津市医科大学,天津300070 [2]武汉大学政治与公共管理学院 [3]国家卫生计生委统计信息中心
出 处:《中国卫生事业管理》2018年第5期394-397,共4页Chinese Health Service Management
基 金:教育部人文社科青年项目"健康冲击视角下我国农村居民重大疾病测量模型及保障效应研究"(16YJCZH137);国家卫生计生委卫生统计信息中心项目"卫生服务体系绩效评估研究"
摘 要:自2000年卫生系统反应性概念提出至今,卫生系统反应性在我国卫生系统及其子系统评价方面得到了广泛应用,其作为满意度的重要补充成为患者角度评价卫生系统绩效的重要指标。然而,我国在使用过程中仍然存在内涵界定不清、"合理期望"未调整、碎片化和支持决策不紧密等问题。健康中国新背景下,我国卫生系统反应性研究需要重视内涵界定和评价系统性,关注服务提供方和管理方等多方反应性,开发针对不同人群和疾病的评价工具,加强我国反应性维度权重研究,重视评价过程中"合理期望"的调整及方法简化,最终提高反应性在卫生系统评价和卫生决策中的应用。The concept of health system responsiveness was put forward in 2000,which has been widely applied in China's health system evaluation,and has been regarded as an important index in health system performance evaluation for the supplement to satisfaction degree.However,there still have some problems,such as unclear definition,unadjusted"reasonable expectation",fragmentation of evaluation and decision support.Under the background of Healthy China,researchers on health system responsiveness should value the connotation and evaluation system,concern multiple responsiveness of service provider and management,develop evaluation tools for different population and diseases,strengthen the research of responsiveness dimension weight in China,pay attention to the adjustment and simplification of "reasonable expectation" evaluation,which can improve the application of responsiveness in health system evaluation and health policy-making.
分 类 号:R1-9[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学] R197
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.36