政府资料开放与著作权法之关系:美国、欧盟、英国比较  

The Relationship Between Open Government Data and Copyright Law:U.S.,EU and United Kingdom Comparison

作　　者：杨智杰 Yang Zhijie(National Yunlin University of Science ＆ Technology, Institute of Technology Law, Yunlin Taiwa)

机构地区：[1]云林科技大学科技法律所

出　　处：《河南财经政法大学学报》2018年第3期123-133,共11页Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law

摘　　要：推动开放政府资料有必要厘清政府资讯公开法与著作权法之关系。美国、欧盟、英国如何处理开放政府资料与著作权法间的关系的比较研究能够提供有益的借鉴。美国对政府数据不拥有著作权,采取开放态度一般不会涉及著作权问题。欧盟于2003年制定公部门信息再利用指令,2013年修改,将图书馆、博物馆与档案馆等享有知识产权之数据再利用,首次纳入指令范围,如何处理政府资料与著作权关系值得关注。英国对政府著作享有皇室著作权,2005年根据欧盟指令制定公部门信息再利用规则,同时发展出一整套授权架构,提供三种模式的授权方式处理政府数据开放与著作权的关系。When governments promote open government data movement,the relationships between open access regime and copyright law need to be taken into consideration. This article will compare the U. S.,EU and United Kingdom,finding out how they deal with the relationship between open government data and copyright law.The U. S. federal government doesn＇t own copyrights in federal government works,or take open access policy.EU passed direction on the Re-use of Public Sector Information(PSI Directive） in 2003,which emphasized it will not change the existing access regimes in the Member States,and allowed charges minimum fee for supplying and allowing re-use of documents.The PSI direction was revised in 2013,after that,contents held by museums,libraries and archives began falling within the scope of application as well. In the United Kingdom,the concept of ＂Crown Copyright＂exists for government works.For conforming to EU PSI direction,UK passed Re-use of Public Sector Information Regulations in 2005,and revised it in 2015. Besides,UK developed a UK Government Licensing Framework,setting three default ways of licensing.

关 键 词：开放政府数据 著作权法 欧盟公部门信息再利用指令 英国公部门信息再利用规则 

分 类 号：D913.4[政治法律—民商法学]