检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:易华 姜淑霞[1] 秦伟[1] YI Hua;JIANG Shu-xia;QIN Wei.(Department of Radiology, Qingdao Eighth People' s Hospital, Qingdao 266100, China)
出 处:《中国实用医药》2018年第13期5-7,共3页China Practical Medicine
摘 要:目的探究肝外胆管结石运用核磁胰胆管成像与腹部CT诊断的应用价值。方法 80例肝外胆管结石患者,均经病理及手术证实,根据随机分组原则分为观察组(采用核磁胰胆管成像诊断,40例)和对照组(采用腹部CT诊断,40例),分析观察两组诊断检出率及诊断满意度。结果观察组诊断检出率为82.5%,明显高于对照组的60.0%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组诊断满意度为90.0%,明显高于对照组的72.5%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论与腹部CT诊断相比,肝外胆管结石采用核磁胰胆管成像诊断具有较高的诊断检出率和诊断满意度,诊断准确性较好,可以进行积极普及推广。Objective To investigate the application value of nuclear magnetic resonance oancreatobiliary imaging and abdominal CT in the diagnosis of extrahepatic bile duct stones. Methods A total of 80 extrahepatic bile duct stones patients confirmed by pathology and surgery were divided by random grouping method into observation group(diagnosed by nuclear magnetic resonance oancreatobiliary imaging, 40 cases) and control group(diagnosed by abdominal CT, 40 cases). The diagnostic detection rate and diagnostic satisfaction was compared in two groups. Results The observation group had obviously higher diagnostic detection rate as 82.5% than 60.0% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05). The observation group had obviously higher diagnostic satisfaction as 90.0% than 72.5% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05). Conclusion Compared with abdominal CT, nuclear magnetic resonance oancreatobiliary imaging shows higher diagnostic detection rate and diagnostic satisfaction with good diagnostic accuracy, and it can be actively popularized and promoted.
分 类 号:R445.2[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学] R575.7[医药卫生—诊断学] R816.5[医药卫生—临床医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.70