庭审中心主义架构下专家辅助人制度实证研究——以医疗损害责任案件为切入点  

An Empirical Study of the Expert Assistant System in Court-centered Model—— from the Perspective of Medical Damage Liability Cases

作　　者：杨小利[1] YANG Xiao-li(National Judges College, Beijing 101100, China)

机构地区：[1]国家法官学院,北京101100

出　　处：《中国司法鉴定》2018年第3期10-19,共10页Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences

摘　　要：证在法庭、辩在法庭、判在法庭是庭审中心主义的核心要义。对专家辅助人制度而言,其在诉讼中发挥作用的场域也仅限于庭审中在专业性事实问题上对当事人提供帮助。2015年《民诉法解释》对该制度做出了进一步完善,制度完善的效果需要实践来检验。以医疗损害责任案件为切入点,通过对相关案例的研究发现,司法实践中专家辅助人制度运行中的问题主要集中在制度启动、专家资格审查和专家辅助人意见采信三个方面。而上述问题的解决,需通过对专家辅助人权、责、义等具体规定的完善来实现;也需通过对法官释明权,裁判文书说理及加强制度的宣传等外部制度予以保障。Providing evidence to court,arguing in court and judging by court are the essence of making courts as the center of litigation.For the expert assistant system,its field is the court where it helps the parties regarding professional factual issues.The Interpretation of the Civil Procedure Law of 2015 further improved the system,whereas its effectiveness depends on the efficient practice at various levels of courts.Taking medical malpractice cases as the starting point,through the study of relevant cases,it is found that the main problems are concentrated on those three aspects：initiation of the system,review of expert qualification and the acceptance of expert assistants＇opinions.To solve the above problems,it is necessary to stipulate the expert assistants＇rights,duties and responsibilities,which should in turn be assured by making clear the right of interpretation by judges,improving the reasoning of the rulings and promoting the publicity of the system.

关 键 词：专家辅助人 鉴定意见 证据采信 

分 类 号：DF8[政治法律—法学]