检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张扬 郭洁[1] 范崇盛[1] ZHANG Yang;GUO Jie;FAN Chong - sheng(Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Luoyang Central Hospital, Luoyang 471000 China)
机构地区:[1]洛阳市中心医院耳鼻喉科,河南洛阳471000
出 处:《内蒙古医学杂志》2018年第4期401-402,共2页Inner Mongolia Medical Journal
摘 要:目的比较局部与全身激素治疗突发性耳聋耳鸣的近期疗效。方法选取2015年1月至2017年5月我院收治的突发性耳聋耳鸣患者196例作为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为对照组98例和实验组98例。对照组采取局部激素治疗,实验组采取全身激素治疗,观察并比较两组患者的近期疗效、不良反应及并发症。结果实验组患者的总有效率为91.84%(90/98),显著高于对照组的79.59%(78/98),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者不良反应发生率、并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论局部激素治疗突发性耳聋耳鸣临床疗效优于全身激素治疗,安全性较好,值得临床推广。Objective To compare the short - term curative effect of local and systemic hormone therapy on sudden deafness and tinnitus. Methods A total of 196 patients with sudden deafness tinnitus who were ad-mitted to our hospital from January 2015 to May 2017 were selected as control group(n =98) and experimental group(n=98) according to random number table. The control group was treated with local hormones, and the experimental group was treated with systemic hormones. The short - term effects, adverse reactions and compli-cations of the two groups were observed and compared. Results The total effective rate of the experimental group was 91.84% (90/98), which was significantly higher than that of the control group (79.59%, 78/98). The difference was statistically significantCP^ 0.05) . There was no significant difference in the incidence of ad-verse reactions and complication between the two groups (P 〉0.05). Conclusion Local hormonal treatment of sudden deafness tinnitus clinical efficacy superior to systemic hormonal therapy, safety is good, worthy of clinical promotion.
分 类 号:R764.43[医药卫生—耳鼻咽喉科]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30