检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋扬 潘云涛[1] 赵筱媛[1] Song Yang;Pan Yuntao;Zhao Xiaoyuan(Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China, Beijing 100038, China)
出 处:《中国科技论坛》2018年第6期98-109,共12页Forum on Science and Technology in China
摘 要:本文将可穿戴设备领域上市公司作为研究对象,基于专利情报分析视角,采用专利计量、社会网络分析、专利地图等信息可视化技术方法,从专利申请数量、专利被引频次、专利技术范围、专利布局等方面挖掘可穿戴设备领域上市公司技术竞争力态势、技术集群分布,评估上市公司竞争优势以及领域内各上市公司技术发展联系。研究结果表明:IBM、微软和谷歌实力雄厚,拥有较多高质量专利;从专利数量来看,三星、苹果在可穿戴设备领域拥有专利最多,但缺乏高价值专利且专利技术范围较窄。研究发现企业技术竞争力提升需要依靠高质量、高价值和高影响力专利。The paper studied the global market of wearable equipment and technology competitiveness of listed companies. It took listed companies in wearable devices as research subject and used patent information visualization methods. It explored overall technology competitions situation and the clustering distribution of cluster. And then the paper evaluated the listed companies' competitive advantage and relationship of technology development among the listed companies. The results show that IBM,Microsoft and Google have more patents with high quality; Samsung and Apple in the field of wearable devices have most patents,but lack of high value and narrow scope of patent technology. Technology competitiveness of enterprises relies on patent with high quality,high value and high impact.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.44