再论语义学/语用学界面之争  

Further on Semantics-Pragmatics Interface

作　　者：伍思静[1] 张荆欣[1] Wu Si-jing ,Zhang Jing-xin(Jilin University, Changchun 130012, Chin)

机构地区：[1]吉林大学

出　　处：《外语学刊》2018年第3期7-14,共8页Foreign Language Research

基　　金：国家社科基金项目“雷卡纳蒂语言哲学思想研究”(16BZX071);吉林大学基本科研业务费项目“多维视角下的当代意义理论研究”(451160302286)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：语义学与语用学的界面之争由来已久、历久弥新。各流派基于其对语义内容、语境内涵的不同理解,建立各自关于语境对语义的影响的观点,从而形成对语用学与语义学关系的不同看法。本文对近年来讨论此话题的各派观点进行梳理和分析,发现近十年来这一论题引发更激烈的论争,并由此衍生出三大主要路径和六大主要流派,现已成为当今语言哲学界最前沿的话题之一。迄今为止语义学/语用学界面之争仍无定论,但是各流派对于语义、语境、语境依赖性等问题不断深入的研究,为系统探索语义学与语用学的关系、深化意义理论研究提供诸多启迪。The division of border between semantics and pragmatics has been under continued and invigorated debate for a long time.This paper analyzes the issues of main camps embroiled and finds that the debate over semantics/pragmatics interface has become increasingly complex and sophisticated in the last decade with three principal routes and six major schools arising,thereby one of the frontiers in the field of philosophy of language. Although the debate has not been settled yet,the increasingly intensive studies on the relevant problems like literal meaning,context,contextual reliance prove insightful for further exploration into the relationship between semantics and pragmatics,thus advancing the theoretical study of meaning.

关 键 词：语义学 语用学 界面 语境论 

分 类 号：H030[语言文字—语言学]