论黑格尔历史辩证法与马克思历史-结构辩证法的根本差异——基于历史终结论的视角  

The Radical Difference Between Hegel’s Historical Dialectics and Marx’s Historical-structural Dialectics

作　　者：喻卿[1] YU Qing(School of Philosophy, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, Chin)

机构地区：[1]武汉大学哲学学院

出　　处：《系统科学学报》2018年第2期19-24,75,共7页Chinese Journal of Systems Science

基　　金：教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(“《资本论》再研究”,编号:11JZD004)

摘　　要：共产主义＂历史终结论＂观点,与＂颠倒＂辩证法的错误理解有关。黑格尔的辩证法本质上是自我意识在时间逻辑中的运动与复归,体现为一种历史辩证法;马克思对其的颠倒,既从人与物质存在的辩证结构中看到了中介性的否定关系,也从历史的连续性中理解了中介性和暂时性,因此表现为一种历史-结构的辩证法。历史唯物主义本质上是关于人实现其自身总体性的哲学;历史的相对真理性和个体性体现了人的未完成性和个性,而人的未完成性和个性驳斥了＂历史终结论＂。The point of view about the communist＇s ＂historical ending＂ is associated with the mis- take understanding of reversed dialectics. Hegel＇ s dialectics is essentially self-awareness in movement and the return of temporal logic, embodied in kind of historical dialectics; On the reverse, both from the dialectical structure of human and beings, Marx saw the intermediary and negative relationship, and under- stood the intermediary and temporary relationship from the continuity of history, so the performance is a kind of historical-dialectical structure. The relative truth and individuality of history embodies people＇ s unfinished and personality; however, the latter dismisses the idea of ＂historical ending＂.

关 键 词：历史终结论 “颠倒” 实践 中介性 未完成性 

分 类 号：N94-02[自然科学总论—系统科学]