检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马士伟 王华[1,3] Ma Shiwei,Wang Hua
机构地区:[1]两岸关系和平发展协同创新中心,福建厦门361005 [2]厦门大学台湾研究院,福建厦门361005 [3]厦门大学台湾研究中心,福建厦门361005
出 处:《台湾研究集刊》2018年第2期45-54,共10页Taiwan Research Journal
基 金:国家社科基金重点项目"全球经济变局下推进两岸经济融合发展研究"(15AJL010)
摘 要:本文基于世界投入产出表,结合增加值出口核算方法,并以之代表贸易获利规模,分别计算了台湾地区、韩国1995—2011年各产业自中国大陆的贸易获利情况。结果显示:其一,2003年以前,台湾地区获利规模大于韩国,但优势并不明显,2003年以后,韩国获利规模超过台湾地区,且不断拉大对台湾的优势;其二,就产业别获利对比而言,台湾制造业领域主要产业获利与韩国相比存在较大差距。本文进一步分析了出口规模、增加值出口率的变化情况,并对台、韩获利差距形成的深层次原因进行了探讨。Based on the world input-output table,combined with the method of value-added export accounting and representing the scale of its trade profit,this paper calculates the trade profits from China's Mainland from 1995 to 2011 made respectively by Taiwan and Korea. The findings show that before 2003,the profit made by Taiwan from mainland was bigger than that of South Korea but with not much superiority. However,since 2003,South Korea has gained profits more than Taiwan and the superiority gap keeps widening. On the other hand,there is a big gap between Taiwan and South Korea in the main manufacturing sector in terms of industrial profit. This paper focuses on analysis of the changes in export scale and value-added export rate,and at the same time,makes a detailed discussion of the deep causes of formation in profit making gap between the two.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3