检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵玉焕[1] 李玮伦 王淞[1] ZHAO Yuhuan;LI Weilun;WANG Song(School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China)
机构地区:[1]北京理工大学管理与经济学院,北京100081
出 处:《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2018年第3期33-44,共12页Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
基 金:北京市自然科学基金面上项目资助"北京市居民消费结构变动对碳排放的影响研究"(9172015);北京市社会科学基金一般项目资助"北京市出口贸易的经济利益和环境成本研究"(17JDYJB010)
摘 要:利用北京市2002—2012年的统计数据,基于投入产出模型分别测算北京市农村和城市低、中、高3个收入居民群组的消费间接碳排放量,利用结构分解分析(SDA)方法对北京市居民消费间接碳排放的影响因素进行分析。结果表明:2002—2012年,城乡居民消费间接碳排放总量从2002年的3 131.81万吨增加至2012年的3 857.67万吨,年均增长率为2.11%。分收入群组看,农村低、中、高3个收入群组的居民间接碳排放随着收入上升而下降,城市低、中、高3个收入群组的居民间接碳排放随着收入上升而上升。SDA结果显示,2002—2012年,平均消费水平变动是城乡居民消费间接碳排放增加的主要驱动因素,碳排放强度变动则是主要抑制因素,消费结构和城镇化水平的变动则影响有限。因此,在研究结论的基础上提出如下减排建议:进一步降低产业部门碳排放强度和优化产业结构;严控人口规模,提升城镇化的水平和质量;在增加居民收入的基础上优化消费结构,鼓励低碳消费、绿色消费。Using statistical data of Beijing City from 2002 to 2012, this study calculated the indirect carbon emissions from rural and urban household consumption in Beijing by 3 income groups based on input-output analysis, and analyzed the influencing factors of indirect carbon emissions from rural and urban household consumption employing Structural decomposition analysis(SDA). The results show that from 2002 to 2012, the indirect carbon emissions from rural and urban household consumption in Beijing increased from 3131.81(104 t CO2)in 2002 to 3857.67(104 t CO2)in 2012 with an annual growth rate of 2.11%. Indirect carbon emissions from low, medium, and high income rural household groups decreased with the increase of income, while indirect emissions from low,medium, and high income urban household groups increased with the increase of income. The SDA results show that, the booming average consumption level was the most important driving force for the increase of indirect carbon emissions of household consumption in Beijing from 2002 to 2012;while the change of carbon emissions intensity was the major factor in restraining the increase of indirect carbon emissions, the impact of consumption structure and urbanization was limited. Policy implications about carbon reduction in Beijing are as follows: further reduce carbon emissions intensity of industries and optimize industrial structure,strictly control the population scale and improve the quality and level of urbanization, and optimize consumption structure based on the increase of income and encourage low carbon green consumption.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28