慢性盆腔痛患者疼痛评分、盆底表面肌电评估及其临床意义  

Pain score,Glazer assessment and its clinical significance in patients with chronic pelvic pain

作　　者：胡道琴[1] 容嘉莉 裴雪梅[1] 彭彧[1] 骆纳德 梁月华[1] 温晓华[1] 林青燕 黄小燕 HU Dao-qin;RONG Jia-li;PEI Xue-mei(The Maternal and Child Health care Hospital of Jiangmen, Jiangmen, Guangdong 529000, Chin)

机构地区：[1]江门市妇幼保健院,广东江门529000

出　　处：《中国优生与遗传杂志》2018年第5期74-76,共3页Chinese Journal of Birth Health & Heredity

基　　金：江门市科技计划项目2016020300690002298

摘　　要：目的探讨疼痛评分、盆底表面肌电评估对慢性盆腔痛患者诊断及指导治疗的临床意义。方法对30例慢性盆腔痛患者进行疼痛图谱描绘和盆底表面肌电评估,并对患者三个疼痛区域的评分进行比较;对慢性盆腔痛患者与对照组盆底表面肌电值进行对比分析。结果泌尿生殖系统区域与膀胱区域疼痛评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);盆底肌肉区域疼痛评分高于泌尿生殖系统区域及膀胱区域,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。患者前、后静息阶段基线平均波幅均大于对照组(P<0.05)。结论疼痛图谱、盆底表面肌电评估能较好的评估慢性盆腔痛患者盆底肌肉功能,具有一定的临床应用价值。Objective：To investigate the clinical significance of pain score and Glazer assessment in the diagnosis and guidance of chronic pelvic floor pain. Methods：Pain mapping and Glazer assessment were performed in 30 patients with chronic pelvic floor pain. The scores of three pain areas were compared. The test values of the Glazer assessment and the reference values were compared and analyzed. The pelvic floor surface electromyographic values of patients with chronic pelvic pain and control group were compared.Results：There was no significant difference in pain score between urogenital system area and bladder area（P〉0.05）;pelvic floor muscle area pain score was higher than urogenital system area and bladder area,and the difference was statistically significant（P〈0.05）. The pre-baseline and post-baseline average amplitudes were greater than that of the control group（P〈0.05）. Conclusions：The pain mapping and Glazer assessment can well evaluate the pelvic floor muscle function of patients with chronic pelvic floor pain. it has certain clinical application value.

关 键 词：慢性盆腔痛 疼痛图谱 盆底表面肌电评估 

分 类 号：R711.33[医药卫生—妇产科学]