检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵秀玲[1] 邓怡 ZHAO Xiu-ling;DENG Yi(Institute of Political Science CASS,Beijing 100028,China)
机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院政治学研究所,北京100028
出 处:《东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版)》2018年第3期11-17,共7页Journal of Northeast Normal University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
基 金:中国社会科学院A类重大研究课题(YZD2011-16)
摘 要:美国的持枪权单从法律层面来看似乎是一种普遍的权利,但是这种权利却要通过市场手段来实现,需要一定的经济基础。这样就在无形中将底层民众拒之门外,所谓的普遍权利也就异化为阶级特权。而从历史来看,自由主义声称持枪权是一种天赋人权,并且能帮助人民抵抗暴政的说法,也是站不住脚的。现在,中国政府出于社会稳定的考量,采取的禁枪政策利国利民。一切要求开放枪禁的声音都是值得警惕的,我们的禁枪政策必须长久坚持下去。The right to keep and bear arms in the United States seems to be an universal right according to the law. However,this right can only be exercised through the market, which means you need to be financially affordable. Therefore,the least well off is deprived of this right imperceptibly, and the so called universal right becomes a class privilege. In running over the pages of history,claims made by libertarian that the right to keep and bear arms is one of the God-given rights and it could empower people to resist tyranny are also ill-founded. At the present time, the prohibition of arms released by Chinese government out of social stability is beneficial to our people and country. We must remain vigilant for all those appeals calling for lifting the ban and maintain our policies for a long time.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222