艺术创造力评估的结构效度与指标权重研究  

The Construct Validity and Index Weight of the Assessment of Artistic Creativity

作　　者：李吉品[1] 郭晓光[1] LI Ji-pin;GUO Xiao-guang(Fine Arts Academy,Northeast Normal University, Changehun 130024, China)

机构地区：[1]东北师范大学美术学院,吉林长春130024

出　　处：《东北师大学报（哲学社会科学版）》2018年第3期143-149,共7页Journal of Northeast Normal University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目(14YJA880047);吉林省社会科学基金项目(2017BS46);吉林省教育科学规划课题(GH170017)

摘　　要：为考察艺术创造力同感评估的结构效度及评估维度的权重,通过让110名艺术类大学生完成三个数字设计任务,请三名艺术领域专家从七个评估维度对作品进行评分,运用结构方程模型考察评估的结构效度;让5名艺术领域专家以两两比较的方式,评定艺术创造力的七个维度的相对重要性,运用层次分析法确定计分时采用的维度权重等方法,研究发现上述评估方案的结构模型拟合良好,七个维度按权重由高到低排列依次为想象性(0.387)、新颖性(0.231)、审美性(0.121)、情感性(0.087)、可爱性(0.086)、技术性(0.049)、适宜性(0.039)。因此,采用三个数字设计任务、三名评估专家、七个评估维度的同感评估方案具有良好的效度,计分时各评估维度应相应赋予不同的权重。Research objective：To explore the construct validity and the fit index weight of the consensual assessment of artistic creativity. Research methods： 110 art college students were asked to complete three number-design tasks and 3 art experts were invited to evaluate the works from seven dimensions. Five art experts were also required to rate each dimension＇s relative importance. Research results： The assessment method above had good fit index; Seven dimensions in order of index weight were imagination, novelty, aesthetics, affection, loveliness, technicality and suitability. Conclusion： The assessment plan with three number-design tasks, three experts and seven dimensions has a high validity and each dimension should be given the differently relative weight.

关 键 词：艺术创造力 同感评估 结构效度 指标权重 

分 类 号：G642.474[文化科学—高等教育学]