论我国民法典形成之时总则编之调整  

The Amendment to the General Provisions When Enacting Civil Code of China

作　　者：柳经纬[1] Liu Jingwei

机构地区：[1]甘肃政法学院,甘肃兰州730070

出　　处：《政治与法律》2018年第6期104-114,共11页Political Science and Law

基　　金：国家社科基金重点项目"中国民法理论体系构建问题"(项目编号:11AFX003)的部分研究成果

摘　　要：我国《民法总则》在立法技术上未严格遵守"提取公因式"的规范,在内容上未能满足"普遍适用性"的要求,在我国民法典形成之时对其进行适当调整不仅有较大的空间,而且时间也允许。应当按照民法典编纂目标任务的要求,尽最大努力,确保法典的体系性和科学性。应当将我国《民法总则》中那些对分则编和单行法不具有"普遍适用性"的规定调整出总则编,回归其本位;整合我国《民法总则》第五章和第八章相关内容,设"民事权利取得、行使与保护"章,完善民事权利救济制度;修改有违法理、逻辑、不合体系、内容重复或缺漏等不协调的条文,力求规范合理、内容协调一致。The General Provisions of the Civil Law do not strictly abide by the norm ot ＂＇extracting pub- lic factors＂ in legislative technology, and fail to meet the requirement of universal applicability in content. There is not only big space but also time for the proper amendment to the general provisions when enacting the Civil Code. We should do our best to ensure the systematic and scientific nature of the code according to the requirements of the objectives and tasks of compiling the civil code. We should exclude those provisions without ＂universal applicability＂ to the Volume of Specific Provisions and slip laws in the current General Provisions from the Volume of General Provisions and make the latter enjoy its original nature; integrate rel- evant rules in Chapter V and Chapter VIII of the General Provisions to establish the Chapter of ＂the Acquisi- tion, Exercise and Protection of Civil Rights＂, and improve the system of civil rights relief; revise some in- congruous provisions which are contrary to jurisprudence and logic, do not conform to the system, have over- laooing orovisions or legal loopholes, so as to make rules reasonable and content coordinated.

关 键 词：民法典 民法总则 法律体系 法律修订 

分 类 号：DF51[政治法律—民商法学]