从“丰菜之争”看个人信息上的权利构造  

On the Construction of Rights in Personal Information from the Dispute between SF Express and Cainiao

作　　者：任丹丽[1] Ren Danli

机构地区：[1]东南大学法学院,江苏南京211189

出　　处：《政治与法律》2018年第6期131-139,共9页Political Science and Law

摘　　要：在大数据成为新兴经济资源的背景下,"丰菜之争"将网络平台关于用户信息控制权的争夺具象化。我国《民法总则》没有采取权利模式保护个人信息,使得各方主体围绕个人信息产生的权利或利益在内容、性质和形式等方面存在模糊之处。辨明不同类型信息的内容及其主体,借鉴相关部门法中的成熟制度和研究成果,在保障个人信息权利的基础上构建信息利益的分享机制,有利于大数据产业的健康发展。Against the background that the big data has become a resource of emerging economy, the dispute between SF Express and Cainiao concretized the network platforms＇ struggle for control of users＇ information. The General Provisions of Civil Law of China does not adopt the mode of right to protect personal information, thus leading to vagueness in the content, nature and form of various subjects＇ rights or interests in personal information. It is helpful for healthy development of the big data industry to distinguish contents and subjects of different types of information, learn from mature systems and research fruits of other relevant areas of law, establish mechanisms of sharing information interest on basis of protecting the right of personal information.

关 键 词：信息控制权 个人信息 信息利益 

分 类 号：DF529[政治法律—民商法学]