检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张旖旎
机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院研究生院社会发展系
出 处:《社会发展研究》2018年第2期199-216,共18页Journal of Social Development
摘 要:社会组织的终结是一个新的研究议题。既有研究多关注常规型社会组织,却忽视了任务型社会组织;多关注社会组织如何实现"永继经营",却忽视了社会组织的终结结果及终结机制。本文结合质性访谈材料,通过描述一个应急性社会组织的终结过程,分析社会组织终结的制度性要素,以及制度性要素如何发挥作用。研究表明,社会组织的终结涉及组织目标、组织调适和组织发展路径三类制度性要素,合称制度性终结。最后,本文试图阐述"有终结无终点"的社会组织发展意义。The termination of social organization is a new research field. The present social organization research pays more attention to the traditional organization and neglects the emergency organization which is one kind of the task-oriented organization as well as pays more attention to the "sustainable development"of the social organizations and ignores the termination and ending mechanism of social organization. Based on qualitative interviews,this paper studies the institutional factors and their influences of the termination on social organization by analyzing the termination process of an emergency organization. The research shows that the termination of social organization requires three kinds of institutional factors: orientation,adaptation and development path. Finally,this paper attempts to explore the research field of social organization,and expounds the significance of "There is termination but no destination".
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.233