检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:隗佳 KUI Jia(School of Law, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, Chin)
机构地区:[1]南开大学法学院,天津300350
出 处:《妇女研究论丛》2018年第3期46-53,94,共9页Journal of Chinese Women's Studies
摘 要:基于针对妇女的纠缠骚扰行为在德国呈现出日趋严重之势,德国于2007年在刑法典中引入第238条纠缠骚扰罪(Nachstellung),然而此规定却引发司法界针对纠缠骚扰行为有无必要通过刑法进行规制的长期争论。本文立足于此罪在德国的立法过程,通过分析纠缠骚扰行为的刑事当罚性与刑事要罚性,论证刑法规制对妇女保护的必要性,并讨论该立法模式对中国妇女保护的参考意义。The German government added the provision of Article 238 in the Criminal Code in 2007 to address the increasing issue of stalking (Nachstellung). However, this provision has given rise to a long time debate in German judicial practice about whether it is nec- essary to regulate stalking by Criminal Code. This article will first survey the history of the adoption of the provision, and then focus on a discussion of the necessity of the criminal regulation for the protection of women mainly from two perspectives : the nature and the severity of penalties on stalking. In addition,the article will reflect on the significance of this German example as a legislative model for the pro- tection of Chinese women.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15