检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙长龙 程楠 王训 韩咏竹 洪铭范 蔡永亮[4] 任明山[5] 潘发明[6] 胡纪源 SUN Changlong;CHEN Nan;WANG Xun;HAN Yongzhu;HONG Minfan;CAI Yongliang;REN Mingshan;PAN Famingo;HU Jiyuanz(Anhui University of Chinese Medicine Anhui Hefei 230061,China;Institute of Neurology Hospital Affiliated of Anhui university of Chinese Medicine, Anhui Hefei 230061, China;The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong'Pharmaceutical College, Guangdong Guangzhou 510080, China;The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Anhui Hefei 230031, China;Anhui Provincial Hospital, Anhui Hefei 230061, China;Anhui Medical University, Anhui Hefei 230031, China)
机构地区:[1]安徽中医药大学,安徽合肥230061 [2]安徽中医药大学神经病学研究所附属医院,安徽合肥230061 [3]广州药学院第一附属医院神经内科,广东广州510080 [4]安徽中医药大学第一附属医院神经内科,安徽合肥230061 [5]安徽省立医院神经内科,安徽合肥230061 [6]安徽医科大学公共卫生学院,安徽合肥230061
出 处:《中医药临床杂志》2018年第5期893-898,共6页Clinical Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(NO.81673948);安徽省卫生厅医学科研重点项目(NO.2010A016)
摘 要:目的:观察多中心Wilson病(WD)患者在中西医结合长期驱铜治疗前后WD综合评定量表(GlobleAsessmentScale,GAS)各项目评分的改变并评估其疗效,为建立疗效好、不良反应小的WD长期综合治疗方案提供循证医学依据。方法:参与研究的4个中心共纳入1001例WD确诊患者,随机分成青霉胺(PCA)组、二巯基丁二酸(DMSA)组、肝豆片组和中西医结合组(肝豆片+PCA/DMSA)4组(各组按1︰1︰1︰3平行设计,各组的条件除了治疗方案不同外,其他条件完全相同)。在首次入院时、维持治疗1年时(第2次入院时)、维持治疗2年时(第3次入院时)进行GAS量表各项目(GAS-L、C、M、O项目及神经功能)评分,通过治疗前后自身比较及组间比较,评估各组患者的疗效。结果:各治疗组WD患者GAS各项目评分均较治疗前明显降低,在维持治疗2年时的疗效较维持治疗1年时更为明显,尤以中西医结合组评分改善最显著。结论:4种长期驱铜治疗方法均可改善WD患者的病情,中西医结合长期驱铜治疗的疗效更为显著,是目前WD患者长期治疗最有效的方案。Objective: By-observing the scores change in each item of GAS (Global Assessment Scale) for muhi- center Wilson' s disease(WD) patients before and after long-term decoppering treatment by combining Traditional Chinese and Western medicine and evaluating the therapeutic effect, to provide evidence-based medical basis for long- term comprehensive treatment scheme for WD with good curative effect and low side effects. Method: In this study, all of the 1001 cases of WD patients are from the 4 participating centers .Firstly, sufferers were randomly divided into four groups: PCA group(single with penicillamine therapy), DMSA group (single dimercaptosuccinic acid capsule in treat- ing), Gandou Pian group (single Gandou Pian treatment) and traditional Chinese and Western medicine combined group (PCA/DMSA alternating + Gandou Plan treatment) (Each group was designed parallel to 1:1:1:3. The conditions of each group were the same except the treatment scheme).Then record the score of each items(GAS-L, C, M, O and neu- ral function score) in GAS for each suffer at different time, which included the first-time hospitalization, maintenance treatment for 1 year(the second-time hospitalization), maintenance treatment for 2 year (the third-time hospitalization). Finally, compare suffers' scores in intra group and inter group, and evaluate therapeutic effect for each sufferer. Result: The scores of GAS in each treatment group of WD patients were significantly lower than before, and the therapeutic ef- fect of maintenance treatment for 2 years was more obvious than that of 1 year, especially for the traditional Chinese and Western medicine combined group . Conclusion: Four kinds of the long-term deeoppering treatment methods can improve the condition of WD patients. The combination of traditional Chinese and Western medicine has a more sig- nificant effect on long-term decoppering treatment, which is the best treatment scheme for WD patients at present.
关 键 词:WILSON病 中西医结合治疗 多中心研究 GAS量表 疗效
分 类 号:R259[医药卫生—中西医结合]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.149.2.199