检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王文珣[1] 朱焕娣[1] 黄海琴 WANG Wen-xun;ZHU Huan-di;HUANG Hai-qin.(Division One of Chemotherapy, Guangdong Agriculture and Reclamation Central Hospital, Zhanfiang 524002, Chin)
出 处:《中国实用医药》2018年第16期147-148,共2页China Practical Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨临床护理干预对肝癌介入治疗患者护理满意度及生存质量的影响。方法 200例肝癌介入治疗患者,随机分成对照组和观察组,各100例,对照组实施常规护理干预,观察组实施临床护理干预,比较两组患者护理满意度以及生存质量评分。结果观察组患者生存质量(心理功能、躯体功能、社会功能、生理功能)评分明显优于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者护理满意度为98.0%,明显高于对照组的91.0%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对肝癌介入治疗患者进行临床护理干预可有效提高护理满意度以及生存质量,值得临床推广应用。Objective To investigate the effect of clinical nursing intervention on nursing satisfaction and quality of life in patients with liver cancer undergoing interventional therapy. Methods A total of 200 patients with liver cancer undergoing interventional therapy were randomly divided into control group and observation group, with 100 cases in each group. The control group received conventional nursing intervention, and the observation group received clinical nursing intervention. The nursing satisfaction and quality of life score between the two groups was compared. Results The observation group had obviously better quality of life score(mental function, physical fuaction, social fuaction, physiological fuaction) than the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05). The observation group had obviously higher nursing satisfaction as 98.0% than 91.0% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05). Conclusion Clinical nursing intervention for patients with liver cancer undergoing interventional therapy can effectively improve nursing satisfaction and quality of life, and it is worthy of clinical promotion and application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.190.159.222