检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谢晓东 XIE Xiaodong(The People's Hospital of Anyuan County, Anyuan 342100, China)
出 处:《华夏医学》2018年第1期120-123,共4页Acta Medicinae Sinica
摘 要:目的:探讨血液透析联合血液灌流治疗尿毒症的效果。方法:90例尿毒症患者随机分为两组,对照组45例,采用血液透析治疗,观察组45例,采用血液透析联合血液灌流治疗,疗程3个月,比较两组治疗效果。结果:治疗后,观察组肌酐、尿素氮等肾功能指标低于对照组,血磷、甲状旁腺素、C反应蛋白(CRP)低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组总有效率95.6%,高于对照组的75.6%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:血液透析联合血液灌流治疗尿毒症比单独血液透析效果好。Objective: To investigate the effect of hemodialysis combined with hemoperfusion in the treatment of uremia. Methods: 90 cases of uremia were divided into two groups randomly. 45 cases in the control group were treated with hemodialysis,and 45 cases in the observation group were treated with hemodialysis combined with hemoperfusion. After 3 months of treatment,the curative effect of the two groups was compared. Results: After treatment,the renal function index of creatinine and urea nitrogen in the observation group was lower than that of the control group,and the blood phosphorus,parathyroid hormone and C reactive protein( CRP) were lower than those in the control group,the differences were statistically significant( P〈0.05). The total effective rate of the observation group was 95.6%,which was higher than that of the control group( 75.6%),and the difference was statistically significant( P〈0.05).Conclusion: Hemodialysis combined with hemoperfusion is better than single hemodialysis in the treatment of uremia.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.198