乡贤会嵌入民族地区乡村治理的内在价值及路径选择——以印江自治县“村两委+乡贤会”为例  

Intrinsic Value and Path Selection of Country Squire Council Embedding in the Rural Governance in Ethnic Areas:A Case Study of Yinjiang County

作　　者：和思鹏[1,2] 卢丽娟 HE Si-peng;LU Li-juan(School of Marxism,Central University of Finance and Economics, BeiJing 10081, China;Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang, Guizhon 550025, China;Guizhou Provincial Institute of Ethnic Studies, Guiyang, Guizhou 550004, China)

机构地区：[1]中央财经大学马克思主义学院,北京100081 [2]贵州财经大学,贵州贵阳550025 [3]贵州省民族研究院,贵州贵阳550004

出　　处：《贵州民族研究》2018年第4期42-46,共5页Guizhou Ethnic Studies

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目"实现中华民族伟大复兴中国梦研究"(编号:14ZDA007);中央财经大学研究生科研创新基金项目"中国特色社区协商治理现代化研究"(编号:201621)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：面对传统乡村管理模式的诸多困境,印江土家族苗族自治县将乡贤参事会嵌入乡村治理,探索构建出"村两委+乡贤会"协商治理模式。乡贤会协商治理模式在经济带动、政治引导、文化引领、维护和谐以及生态发展等方面呈现出多维价值意蕴,这一模式内在蕴含着中国特色社会主义社会治理的政治逻辑。构建乡村社会协商治理模式必须强化基层党组织在民族地区乡村治理中的领导核心地位,促进传统一元管理向多元主体合作共治的积极转变,推进民族地区乡村协商民主制度化、规范化、程序化发展,加强民族地区乡村自治、德治、法治"三治一体"建设。Governance dilemmas has been largely acknowledged in traditional rural management mode. Yinjiang county has embeded the country squire council in its rural governance, exploring a new consultative governance mode, that is village party branch and village committee country squire council. This new mode shows its value in many aspects, and contains the profound political logic. Therefore, To build a rural social governance model, we must strengthen the leadership of the grassroots party organizations, promote the positive transformation from one dollar management to pluralism, Promote the institutionalization, standardization and procedural development of grass-roots consultative democracy, and strengthen rural self-government, the rule of virtue, and the rule of law.

关 键 词：村两委 乡贤会 协商治理 内在价值 路径选择 

分 类 号：D638[政治法律—政治学]