检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘霜纯 刘亚康[2] 熊丽芳[2] 王龙平 张鸣生[2] LIU Shuangchun;LIU Yakang;XIONG Lifang(The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510317)
机构地区:[1]暨南大学第一临床附属医院,广州510317 [2]广东省人民医院康复医学科
出 处:《中国康复医学杂志》2018年第6期630-635,共6页Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
基 金:广东省科技计划项目(2010B031600164);广州市科技计划项目(2012J4300083)
摘 要:目的:探讨反馈式呼吸电刺激训练对肺癌术后患者膈肌运动和肺功能的影响。方法:将30例肺癌术后患者按随机数字表分为试验组和对照组,每组各15例。试验组在常规护理基础上给予反馈式呼吸电刺激训练,对照组接受常规护理和腹式呼吸训练,呼吸训练强度均为20min/次,3次/周,共4周。两组患者均于训练前、训练4周后、术后3个月时完成M型超声下观察平静呼吸、深吸气2种呼吸状态时的双侧膈肌运动幅度和肺功能检测。肺功能观察指标包括用力肺活量(forced vital capacity,FVC)、第一秒用力呼气容积(forced expiratory volume in first second,FEV1)及其各自占预测值的百分比。结果:训练4周后,两组患者膈肌运动幅度和肺功能均较基线值改善,但与对照组比较,试验组的FVC、FEV1%、FVC%、平静呼吸和深吸气时的术侧膈肌运动幅度改善程度更显著(P<0.05);在术后3个月,试验组的FVC、FEV1%、深吸气时的双侧膈肌运动幅度均较对照组增加,差异具有显著性意义(P<0.05)。结论:反馈式呼吸电刺激训练可以改善肺癌术后患者的膈肌运动和肺功能。Objective: To study the effect of respiratory electrical stimulation training with biofeedback on the diaphragmatic motion and respiratory function for the patients with lung cancer after pulmonary resection. Method: Thirty patients following pulmonary lobectomy were randomly divided into experimental group (n=15) and control group (n=15). In addition to routine postoperative care,the experimental group received a 4-week respiratory electrical stimulation training with biofeedback using an electric stimulus feedback trainer(20mins per time,3 times per week).The control group received postoperative routine nursing and abdominal breath training(20mins per time,3 times per week). Diaphragmatic motion and respiratory function of 2 groups were tested before and after the training. M-mode ultrasonography was used to observe bilateral diaphragmatic moving range during quiet breathing and deep breathing. The pulmonary function tests included forced vital capacity(FVC), forced expiratory volume in first second ( FEV1) and its percentage of predicted value. Result: After 4 week training,the value of diaphragmatic motion and respiratory function both improved,compared to the baseline value. Respiratory function of the training group was significantly greater than that of the control group, and diaphragmatic moving range on the operation side during quiet breathing and deep breathing of the training group was significantly higher than that of the control group(P〈0.05).3 months after the resection, FVC%,FEV1% and diaphragmatic moving range on both side during deep breathing were more obvious in experimental group,compared to control group(P〈0.05). Conclusion: Respiratory electrical stimulation training with biofeedback can improve pulmonary function and diaphragmatic motion function of the patients following pulmonary lobectomy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28