检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:纪秀波[1] Ji Xiubo(Department of Anesthesiology, Southern District, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 102618, Chin)
机构地区:[1]中国中医科学院广安门医院南区麻醉科,北京102618
出 处:《中国医药》2018年第7期1079-1082,共4页China Medicine
摘 要:目的观察小剂量不同浓度罗哌卡因蛛网膜下腔麻醉在老年膝髋关节置换术中的应用效果。方法选取2016年6月至2017年6月中国中医科学院广安门医院收治的膝髋关节置换术老年患者92例,按照随机数字表法分为A组和B组,各46例。A组蛛网膜下腔注入0.50%的罗哌卡因;B组蛛网膜下腔注入0.25%的罗哌卡因。比较2组麻醉持续时间、运动恢复时间和感觉恢复时间;采用改良Bromage法评定手术侧下肢运动神经阻滞程度;观察不同时间心率和平均动脉压变化,以及不良反应发生情况。结果 B组麻醉持续时间、运动恢复时间和感觉恢复时间明显短于A组[(85±7)min比(103±10)min、(106±11)min比(127±14)min、(161±13)min比(196±15)min],差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。B组手术侧下肢运动神经阻滞Ⅰ、Ⅱ级多于A组,Ⅲ级少于A组[23.9%(11/46)比6.5%(3/46)、50.0%(23/46)比41.3%(19/46)、26.1%(12/46)比52.2%(24/46)],差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。B组麻醉5、10、30 min时心率和平均动脉压明显高于A组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。B组不良反应发生率明显低于A组[13.0%(6/46)比34.8%(16/46)],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 0.25%浓度罗哌卡因在老年膝髋关节置换中的效果优于0.50%浓度罗哌卡因,且不良反应少。ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of low dose ropivacaine subarachnoid anesthesia on elderly patients undergoing knee and hip arthroplasty. MethodsA total of 92 elderly patients undergoing knee and hip arthroplasty from June 2016 to June 2017 in Guang′anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences were randomly divided into group A and group B, with 46 cases in each group. Group A had subarachnoid injection of 0.50% ropivacaine and group B had 0.25% ropivacaine. Anesthesia duration, motor recovery time and sensory recovery time, degree of lower limb motor block, heart rate, mean arterial pressure and adverse reactions were analyzed. ResultsAnesthesia duration time, motor recovery time and sensory recovery time in group B were significantly shorter than those in group A[(85±7)min vs (103±10)min, (106±11)min vs (127±14)min, (161±13)min vs (196±15)min](P〈0.05). Lower limb motor block grade Ⅰ and Ⅱ ratios in group B were significantly higher and grade Ⅲ ratio was significantly lower than those in group A[23.9%(11/46) vs 6.5%(3/46), 50.0%(23/46) vs 41.3%(19/46), 26.1%(12/46) vs 52.2%(24/46)](P〈0.05). Heart rate and mean arterial pressure 5, 10, 30 min after anesthesia in group B were significantly higher than those in group A(P〈0.05). Adverse reaction rate in group B was significantly lower than that in group A[13.0%(6/46) vs 34.8%(16/46)](P〈0.05). ConclusionRopivacaine 0.25% has better anesthetic effect and less adverse reaction than 0.50% in subarachnoid anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing knee and hip arthroplasty.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.135.218.96