检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:袁俊俊 李成[1] 铁瑛[1] 赵书寒 YUAN Jun-jun;LI Cheng;TIE Ying;ZHAO Shu-han(School of Mechanical Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)
出 处:《玻璃钢/复合材料》2018年第5期19-24,共6页Fiber Reinforced Plastics/Composites
基 金:国家自然科学基金(U1333201);河南省科技攻关项目(152102210039)
摘 要:为研究室温下复合材料胶接修补结构的疲劳性能,以三维渐进损伤理论为基础,创建了复合材料胶接修补模型,利用材料损伤判断子程序实现对修补结构的静拉伸失效载荷及剩余强度的预测分析,并进行了相关试验的对比分析。采用5种不同尺寸的圆形补片来评价修补效果,并利用超景深仪对修补试件的疲劳损伤扩展模式进行微观测量。结果表明:静载拉伸中,尺寸为3.5r的修补结构承载能力最好;疲劳循环中,尺寸为2.5r的修补结构剩余强度提升效果最好;疲劳载荷下,当循环次数较低时,修补结构的主要损伤为基体开裂,而随着循环次数的增大,主要损伤为纤维断裂。In order to investigate the fatigue behavior of the adhesive bonding repair in composite,the model of adhesive bonding structure with different patch dimension has been constructed based on the three-dimensional progressive damage theory. The ultimate static strength and residual strength of the bonding structure are predicted using damage subroutine,and the comparative analysis of fatigue test and static tensile test were performed. Five circle patches of different dimension are selected for evaluating the repair performance. Meanwhile,the damage degradation mechanism of the patch repair structure under different stress levels with different cyclic loadings is studied by microcosmic measurement. The results reveal that the ultimate static strength of the adhesive bonding structure with the 3. 5 r patch is better than others. And the residual strength of the adhesive bonding structure with the 2. 5 r patch is maximal. Under low fatigue cyclic loading,the dominant damage is normally matrix cracking,while fiber breaking is the main damage pattern at the high fatigue cyclic loading for composite materials.
关 键 词:复合材料 疲劳试验 损伤扩展 胶接修补 渐进损伤
分 类 号:TB332[一般工业技术—材料科学与工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.223.172.149