基于开放同行评议的学者影响力评价研究——以F1000为例  

The Research of Scholar Influence Evaluation Based on Open Peer Review:Take the F1000 as an Example

作　　者：袁国华[1,2] 寇晶晶 张建勇[1] 韩正琪 Yuan Guohua;Kou Jmgjing;Zhang Jianyong;Han Zhengqi(National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190;University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049)

机构地区：[1]中国科学院文献情报中心,北京100190 [2]中国科学院大学,北京100049

出　　处：《图书情报工作》2018年第13期37-44,共8页Library and Information Service

基　　金：国家科技图书文献中心项目“名称规范库建设”(项目编号:科1536)研究成果之一

摘　　要：[目的／意义]提出一种基于开放同行评议的学者影响力评价方法，即通过归纳收敛开放同行评议内容，形成能够表征学者不同层面影响力的多个标签簇，从而从质量层面多角度探索学者影响力，并验证所提方法的有效性。[方法／过程]调研分析国内外现有学者影响力评价方法，在此基础上，设计构建基于开放同行评议的学者影响力评价方法，并以开放同行评议平台F1000为例，进行实证研究和对比分析。[结果／结论]基于开放同行评议的学者评价方法是一种新的评价角度，实现了对学者的多角度评价，增加了学者影响力的饱满度和辨识度。分析表明，该方法与文献计量评价方法不具有显著相关性，可以作为对传统评价方法的一种补充。传统的定量分析与开放同行评议方法的结合将是未来学术评价的发展趋势。[ Purpose/significance] This paper designed and built an evaluation method of scholar influence based on open peer review.[Method/process] First the paper investigated the evaluation methods of scholar influence home and abroad. Then an evaluation method of scholar influence based on open peer review was designed and built. And Empirical research and comparative analysis were conducted. [ Result/conclusion] The method of scholar evaluation based on open peer review is a new angle of evaluation, which achieves a multi-angle evaluation of scholars and increases the fullness and discernment of scholar influence. The analysis shows that there is no significant correlation between this method and the literature evaluation method, which can be used as a supplement to traditional evaluation methods. The comb nation of traditional quantitative analysis methods and open peer review methods will be the development trend of future academic evaluation.

关 键 词：学者影响力 评价 开放同行评议 F1000 

分 类 号：G250[文化科学—图书馆学]