检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张彬 ZHANG Bin(School of Economics, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, Chin)
机构地区:[1]复旦大学经济学院,上海200433
出 处:《商业研究》2018年第6期126-132,共7页Commercial Research
基 金:山东省人文社科课题;项目编号:J16WE38;山东外贸职业学院课题;项目编号:ky2017-01;国家社科基金项目;项目编号:15BJL081
摘 要:基于价值链视角并考虑贸易品结构,本文就中国与印度经贸往来及对中国产业升级的作用进行分析。按照Lall的产品分类标准,中国对印度高技术制成品出口额最大,对印度出口结构持续优化。基于价值链视角,SITC一级分类下中国对印度出口中相对价格较高的集中于初级产品,且与印度多呈现较强互补性;在工业制成品方面,中国对印度出口价格相对较弱,互补性逐年增强,但仍弱于初级产品。这与按照Lall分类标准下的统计结果不符,也与中印经济发展水平和需求现状下经贸互补性、尤其是高端制成品互补性较强的理论推断相悖。In views of the added value chains and with the consideration of the structures of commodities, the analysis is carried out about the industrial upgrading in China under the economic and trade cooperation between China and India. The research shows the most China exports to India are the high-teeh and the exports' structure has been continuously improved under the Lall's classification. Meanwhile, in view of the added value chains, China's exports to India with unit price advantage mainly focus on primary products according to the SITC top classification, which have strong complementary relationship with India; China's unit price advantage is relatively weak in manufactured goods, which also have weaker complementary relationship with India comparing to the primary although this relationship is strengthened in recent years. This result is different from the one according to the Lall's classification and inconsistent with the theoretical conclusion that the complementary relationship between China and India should be strong considering two countries' economic development and needs.
分 类 号:F069.9[经济管理—政治经济学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38