论涉外仲裁协议的效力判定——评最高人民法院[2013]民四他字第13号复函案例  

A Discussion on the Validity of Foreign-Related Arbitration Agreement --Concurrently on a Case in a Letter in Reply by the SPC of China

作　　者：黄晖[1] 周江[2] Huang Hui;Zhou Jiang

机构地区：[1]重庆大学法学院 [2]西南政法大学

出　　处：《仲裁研究》2017年第1期34-47,共14页Arbitration Study

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“法院地法倾向对策研究”(批准号:14BFX190);重庆大学中央高校学院科技创新专项“中国体育法治信念建构研究”(106112016CDJSK080010)

摘　　要：约定外国仲裁机构在中国仲裁，此类仲裁协议在实践中较为普遍。鉴于往例多选法无因、用法失度之流弊，最高人民法院民四庭特推典型案例，以彰此类协议的裁判思路及其支持仲裁的友善立场。文涉复函虽肯认仲裁协议效力，但选法和用法仍有未尽未决之关键要点。为止裁判无据无理之后乱，选法宜依“特别法优于一般法”原则，适用《最高人民法院关于适用（中华人民共和国仲裁法）若干问题的解释》（以下简称仲裁法司法解释）而非《中华人民共和国涉外民事关系法律适用法》（以下简称《法律适用法》）或其司法解释之选法规则，排除仲裁机构所在地的选法指引功效。在用法阶段，以《中华人民共和国仲裁法》（以下简称《仲裁法》）为准据法时，首应依仲裁机构设立地法定其资格和能力，继而以一般或自动认可之方式承认其在中国组织仲裁的地位，不生WTO之GATS项下的准入问题。修订仲裁法使之科学化和国际化，是此类问题的根绝方案。It is common that parties related agree on a foreign arbitration body deals with their disputes concerned in China, which leads into chaos in the choice and application of law. In response, the SPC of China intended to make it clear and show its positive position through a letter in reply, but that letter in reply didn＇ t work perfectly. In light of this, lex specialist derogat legi generali should be applied at the stage of choice of law, and judicial interpretation of the arbitration law of China rather than the Law of the Application of Law for Foreign-Related Civil Relations of PRC or its judicial interpretation is supposed to be applied. In the process of application of law, where the arbitration law of China is the lex causae, the law of where the arbitration body was organized is going to be applied in identifying the quantification and ability of the body, then its qualificationandcapacityto perform duties in China is supposed to be acknowledged generally or automatically without reference to the market access problem under GATS of WTO. The fundamental scheme for the issue mentioned above is the revision, scientization and internationalization of the arbitration law of China.

关 键 词：涉外仲裁协议 仲裁机构 法律选择 市场准入 

分 类 号：TU85[建筑科学]