耳穴埋豆对乳腺疼痛患者的治疗效果  

Ear-Pressing Therapy for Breast Pain

作　　者：徐春好[1] 刘华玲[1] 黄晓红[1] 陈水凤 崔闽鲁[1] 林少榕[1] 胡清福 许双塔[1] XU Chun-hao;LIU Hua-ling;HUANG Xiao-hong;CHEN Shui-feng;CUI Min-lu;LIN Shao-rong;HU Qing-fu;XU Shuang-ta(The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, Fujian 36200)

机构地区：[1]福建医科大学附属第二医院,福建泉州362000

出　　处：《按摩与康复医学》2018年第13期19-21,共3页Chinese Manipulation and Rehabilitation Medicine

基　　金：福建省泉州市科技项目--乳腺疼痛病因探讨及多学科协作治疗;编号:2015Z56

摘　　要：目的:探讨耳穴埋豆对乳腺疼痛的治疗效果。方法:将83例乳腺疼痛患者随机分为穴位按摩组(28例)、耳穴埋豆组(28例)和联合治疗组(24例),分别施以穴位按摩、耳穴埋豆及其联合治疗,观察其临床疗效。结果:耳穴埋豆组、联合治疗组总有效率均显著高于穴位按摩组(P<0.05),而耳穴埋豆组、联合治疗组总有效率无显著性差异(P>0.05);耳穴埋豆组、联合治疗组乳房胀痛评分改善程度均显著优于穴位按摩组(P<0.05),耳穴埋豆组、联合治疗组间则无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论:相比穴位按摩,耳穴埋豆治疗乳腺疼痛疗效更显著,而联合治疗并不比单纯耳穴埋豆法更有优势。Objective： To investigate the efficacy of ear-pressing therapy in treatment of breast pain. Methods： 83 cases of patients with breast pain were randomly divided into massage group（28 cases）, ear-pressing group（28 cases） and combination group（24 cases）, and separately treated with acupoints massage, ear-pressing therapy and their combination treatment, observed their efficacy. Results： The overall response rate of ear-pressing group and combination group were significantly higher than that of massage group（P〈0.05）, while there was no statistical difference between ear-pressing group and combination group（P〉0.05）; the improvement of breast pain score of ear-pressing group and combination group were significantly better than that of massage group（P〈0.05）, while there was no statistical difference between ear-pressing group and combination group（P〉0.05）. Conclusion： Compared with acupoints massage, ear-pressing therapy is more effective in breast pain, and combination therapy is not better than single ear-pressing therapy.

关 键 词：乳腺疼痛 耳穴埋豆 疗效 

分 类 号：R246[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]