检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:高丽丽[1,2] GAO Lili(School of Law, Wuhan Universit;Anti- Terrorism Research Center, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430072, China)
机构地区:[1]武汉大学法学院 [2]中南财经政法大学反恐怖主义研究中心,湖北武汉430072
出 处:《河南警察学院学报》2018年第3期65-72,共8页Journal of Henan Police College
摘 要:历经数次修正与重构,我国恐怖犯罪的刑法规制呈现出罪名体系不断丰富,刑罚结构趋于完整,处罚手段不断严厉,打击范围逐渐扩大的趋势;我国关于恐怖犯罪的刑法规制中呈现的刑事理论面向包括:报应刑与目的刑之扞格与兼容,法益保护机能与人权保障机能的抵牾与调和,刑法谦抑性理念;恐怖犯罪的刑法适用中我们应坚持限制解释以及宽严相济的刑事政策之理论路径。After several amendments and reorganizations,the Criminal Law regulation of terrorist crimes in our country have shown a tendency of constantly enriched accusation system,more completed penalties structure,strict punishment and a widening scope of the crackdown. The criminal theory aspects presented in the Criminal Law regulation on terrorist crimes in our country are as follows: the contradictory and compatibility between the principle of retributive and purposive penalty; the contradiction and reconciliation between the protection function of law rights and human rights; and the moderation of Criminal Law. In the application of the Criminal Law to terrorist crimes,we should follow the theoretical path of restrictive interpretation and the criminal policy featuring justice with mercy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145