检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:韦才敏[1,2] 李忠萍[1,2] 范衠 WEI Cai-min;LI Zhong-ping;FAN Zhun(Department of Mathematics, Shantou University, Shantou 515063, China;Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Digital Signals and Image Processing, Shantou University, Shantou 515063, China)
机构地区:[1]汕头大学数学系,广东汕头515063 [2]汕头大学数字信号与图像处理技术重点实验室,广东汕头515063
出 处:《运筹与管理》2018年第6期63-74,共12页Operations Research and Management Science
基 金:国家社会科学基金重点项目(16AGL010)
摘 要:在Bertrand竞争、Stackelberg竞争及集中决策下,研究由单制造商与多竞争零售商组成的双渠道供应链的定价决策问题。运用两阶段优化技术、博弈论及矩阵论,讨论了多竞争零售商与单制造商在价格方面相互竞争的问题,给出不同市场竞争模式及集中决策下供应链成员的博弈均衡解。对比不同博弈框架及集中决策下供应链成员的定价决策,通过数值实验分析了价格敏感度及零售商个数对最优定价决策和最大利润影响,给出一些管理学理论与见解,为双渠道供应链中各成员的管理者制定最优决策提供理论支持。This paper studies the pricing decisions problem of dual-channel supply chain consisting of a manufacturer and multiple competitive retailers under Bertrand competition, Stackelberg competition and centralized decision-making. In this case, where manufacturer and multiple retailers compete with each other over price, we obtain the gaming equilibrium of the supply chain members using two-stage optimization technique, game theory and matrix theory under different competitive patterns and centralized decision-making case, respectively. We compare the pricing decisions of the supply chain members under different game frameworks and centralized deci- sion-making case, and by making a numerical experiment we analyze the influence of price sensitivity and the number of retailers on the optimal retailer price, and the maximum profits of channel members. In addition, we get some managerial implications and provide a theoretical support for dual-channel managers to develop the optimal decisions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.70.25