检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:丁雪辰[1] 叶贝 万旋傲[2] 李丹[1] 桑标[3] DING Xue-chen;YE Bei;WAN Xuan-ao;LI Dan;SANG Biao(Department of Psychology, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China;School of Media and Design, Shanghai JiaoTong University, Shanghai 200240, China;School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China)
机构地区:[1]上海师范大学心理学系,上海200234 [2]上海交通大学媒体与设计学院,上海200240 [3]华东师范大学心理与认知科学学院,上海200062
出 处:《中国临床心理学杂志》2018年第3期512-516,共5页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金(17YJC190002;16YJC860017);上海市社科规划青年课题(16Z2017030002);上海市家庭文明建设课题"流动儿童的家庭教育指导策略"
摘 要:目的:对儿童拒绝敏感性问卷进行初步信效度检验,考察该问卷在中国小学生群体中的适用性。方法:选取上海市652名3~6年级小学儿童,通过项目分析、验证性因素分析等方法检验该量表的项目鉴别力、结构效度、效标效度、内部一致性信度和重测信度。结果:(1)儿童拒绝敏感性问卷的各项目鉴别力较好;(2)儿童拒绝敏感性问卷的结构效度较好,符合理论建构的三因素结构;(3)儿童拒绝敏感性问卷的各维度与自我报告的社交焦虑感、社交自我知觉、负性情感、同伴评价的同伴欺负及教师评价的整体困难显著相关,效标效度良好;(4)儿童拒绝敏感性问卷各维度的内部一致性系数在0.74~0.85之间;(5)儿童拒绝敏感性问卷具有良好的重测信度,各维度两次测量得分之间的相关在0.46~0.51之间。结论:儿童拒绝敏感性问卷在中国文化背景下具有良好的信度和效度。Objective: To examine the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Children' s Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaire(CRSQ) in a sample of Chinese elementary school children. Methods: 652 students in grade 3-6 in Shanghai were recruited in the present study. The item analysis and the confirmation factor analysis were employed to examine the discrimination of items, structure validity, criterion validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability. Results: (1)The item analysis showed acceptable correlations between items and dimensions. (2)The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the constructive validity was good and fitted the three factors model well. (3)Chiidren' s score on CRSQ was significantly associated with self-reported social anxiety, self-perception of social competence, negative affect, peer-rated peer victimization, and teacher-rated total difficulties. (4)The internal consistency of 3 dimensions of CRSQ ranged from 0.74 to 0.85. (5)The test-retest reliability of CRSQ ranged from 0.46 to 0.51. Conclusion: The Chinese version of the CRSQ is reliable and valid in measuring elementary school children' s rejection sensitivity in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117