中文版优逝量表在肿瘤科护士中应用的信效度评价  

Evaluation of the reliability and validity of Chinese-version Good Death Inventory among oncologynurse specialist

作　　者：杨红[1] 陆宇晗 康洁[1] 孙宏玉 Yang Hong;Lu Yuhan;Kang Jie;Sun Hongyu(Nursing Department, Peking University Cancer Hospital ＆ Institute, Beijing 100142, China)

机构地区：[1]北京大学肿瘤医院暨北京市肿瘤防治研究所护理部,100142 [2]北京大学护理学院

出　　处：《中国实用护理杂志》2018年第19期1451-1456,共6页Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing

基　　金：北京大学医学部护理科研基金重点项目（BMU20160516）

摘　　要：目的评价优逝量表在肿瘤科护士中应用的信效度。方法在我国台湾学者翻译的中文版本优逝量表基础上经专家评议、预试验进行进一步修订；对180名肿瘤科护士进行现场问卷调查，对数据进行信度、效度分析。结果修订过的中文版优逝量表包含54个条目，语言通俗易懂，绝大多数受调查者能在25min内完成，量表有效回收率100％。效度检验：I-CVI在0．67～1．00，整个量表的S-CVI／Ave为0．97。量表KMO值为0．863，经过探索性因子分析，协同源量表及我国台湾版本量表的因子分析结果，保持了原有18个因子，其中10个核心因子及8个非核心因子。信度检验：总量表内部一致性系数a=0．950；折半信度为0．832；核心因子量表内部一致性系数a=0．938；非核心因子量表内部一致性系数a=O．876。结论修订的中文版优逝量表具有较好的信度和效度，为终末期患者的优逝状况的他评提供了有效的评估工具。Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of Chinese-version Good Death Inventory among oncology nurse specialists. Methods A further revision has been made in the Chinese- version Good Death Inventory from Taiwan experts through expert review and preliminary experiment. The reliability and validity of the Chinese-version GDI was evaluated among 180 oncology nurse specialists. Results The Chinese-version of GDI was easy to understand. Most respondents finished the whole scale in 25 minutes and the valid response rate of the scale wasl00%. The I-CVI value of each item was 0.67- 1.00, S-CVI/Ave was 0.938. KMO was 0.832, and the revised Chinese-version GDI consisted of 54 items in 18 dimensions （Core 10 Domains and Optional 8 Domains）. The total scale＇ s Cronbach＇ s alpha coefficient was 0.950, split-half reliability coefficient was 0.832. Cronbach＇ s alpha of Core 10 Domains was 0.938 and that of Optional 8 Domains was 0.876. Conclusions The Chinese-version GDI is a valid scale to measure end-of-life care comprehensive outcomes from Chinese oncology nurse specialists＇ perspective.

关 键 词：量表 信度 效度 姑息护理 优逝 肿瘤专科护士 

分 类 号：R473.73[医药卫生—护理学]