能源利用效率不同区域大气污染物协同减排协议研究  

Research on synergistic emission reduction agreement of air pollutant in different energy efficiency zones

作　　者：宋寒[1] 苏洪震 代应[1] SONG Han;SU Hongzhen;DAI Ying(School of Management, Chongqing University of Technolog, Chongqing 400054, Chin)

机构地区：[1]重庆理工大学管理学院,重庆400054

出　　处：《重庆理工大学学报（社会科学）》2018年第5期36-45,共10页Journal of Chongqing University of Technology（Social Science）

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目"知识密集型服务外包中只是共享激励与知识资产争端协调机制研究"(71301182);重庆市基础与前沿研究计划项目"碳排放约束下低碳供应链网络减排优化与协调机制研究"(cstc2016jcyjA0397);重庆市教委科学技术研究项目"面向工业副产物再利用的关联供应链激励政策与监管问题研究"(KJ1400906)

摘　　要：针对能源利用效率不同区域间的大气污染物协同减排问题,构建区域间纳什讨价还价模型,分析绝对数量、相对比例、经济补偿三种区间协同减排协议的有效性。分析表明:绝对数量与相对比例两种协同减排协议无效,而经济补偿能实现区域间大气污染物的协同减排,且均衡的减排数量和经济补偿金额与发达地区的大气污染物排放经济效用价值系数正相关,与欠发达地区的大气污染物排放效用价值系数负相关。经济发达地区与经济欠发达地区总效用的增加值,总体上随着两地区大气污染物排放经济效用价值系数的增加而增长。Aiming at the problem of synergistic emission reduction across different regions with different economic value of air pollutant emission,an inter-regional Nash bargaining model is built. The validity of the three types of inter-regional synergistic emission reduction agreement is analyzed,for example absolute quantity synergistic emission reduction agreement,relative proportion synergistic emission reduction agreement and economic compensation synergistic emission reduction agreement. The results show that the absolute quantity emission reduction agreement and the relative proportion synergistic emission reduction agreement is invalid,but the economic compensation can achieve the synergistic emission reduction. Moreover,the added value of total utility in economically developed areas and economically underdeveloped areas generally increases with the increase of economic utility value coefficient of air pollutant emissions in the two areas.

关 键 词：大气污染 协同减排 经济补偿 讨价还价模型 

分 类 号：F205[经济管理—国民经济]