检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘竹[1] LIU Zhu(Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Deyang City People'sHospital of Sichuan Province, Deyang Sichuan 618000, China)
机构地区:[1]四川省德阳市人民医院肝胆外科,四川德阳618000
出 处:《中国继续医学教育》2018年第16期163-165,共3页China Continuing Medical Education
摘 要:目的探讨管道护理工作坊运用PDCA循环降低非计划性拔管的效果。方法选取2017年1—6月进入我院接受插管治疗的140例患者纳入对照组;选取2017年7—12月进入我院接受插管治疗的140例患者纳入观察组;观察组采用PDCA循环模式,对照组采用常规护理模式,对比两种护理方法的效果。结果在常规护理期间,对照组非计划性拔管发生率为9.29%,观察组非计划性拔管发生率为0.71%,组间数据对比,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组满意度为97.86%,对照组满意度为85.00%,组间数据对比,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在气管插管治疗的患者群体中管道护理工作坊运用PDCA循环,能够降低非计划性拔管发生率并提升患者的护理满意度。Objective To explore the effect of reducing unplanned extubation by PDCA cycle in the pipeline nursing workshop. Methods From January to June 2017, 140 patients who received tracheal intubation in our hospital were enrolled in the control group, and from July to December 2017, 140 patients who received tracheal intubation in our hospital were enrolled in the observation group. The observation group adopted the PDCA cycle mode, the control group adopted the conventional nursing mode. The effect of the two nursing methods was compared. Results During the routine nursing, the incidence of unplanned extubation in the control group was 9.29%, and the incidence of unplanned extubation in the observation group was 0.71%, the difference between the groups was statistically significant(P〈0.05). The satisfaction of the observation group was 97.86%, and the satisfaction of the control group was 85.00%, the difference between the groups was statistically significant(P 〈0.05). Conclusion In the patients with tracheal intubation, the use of PDCA cycle in the pipeline nursing workshop can reduce the incidence of unplanned extubation and improve the patient's nursing satisfaction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28