检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李清 彭岩 LI Qing, PENG Yan(Caoyang Community Health Service Center of Putuo District, Shanghai 200062, Chin)
机构地区:[1]上海市普陀区曹杨街道社区卫生服务中心,上海200062
出 处:《上海护理》2018年第5期16-19,共4页Shanghai Nursing
摘 要:目的调查分析社区卫生服务中心糖尿病门诊建档患者失访原因并评价干预效果。方法选取2015年1月1日前于上海市普陀区曹杨街道社区卫生服务中心糖尿病门诊建档且失访的患者150例,采用问卷调查的形式,了解患者一般资料和失访原因,并对患者进行为期12个月的强化随访干预,比较随访前后患者健康知识的掌握情况和血糖水平。结果糖尿病患者失访原因主要为对随访重视不够、身体原因、错误认知等。随访干预后,糖尿病患者健康知识掌握情况优于干预前;患者空腹血糖及餐后2 h血糖均低于干预前,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论糖尿病患者失访原因较多,应加强对患者失访干预,发挥患者主观能动性,以促进行为改变。Objective To investigate the reasons for loss to follow-up in diabetic patients in Caoyang community,and to evaluate the effects of follow-up intervention. Methods A total of 150 diabetic patients lost to follow-up before January 1 st 2015 in Caoyang Community Health Service Center of Putuo District,Shanghai were selected. The reasons for loss to follow-up were investigated by questionnaire. The patients were followed up for 12 months. The health knowledge and blood sugar level were compared before and after intervention.Results The main reasons for loss to follow-up were insufficient attention to follow-up,physical reasons and cognitive errors. After 12-month follow-up intervention,the health knowledge level was significantly improved( P〈0. 05). And the fasting blood glucose and 2-hour postprandial blood glucose levels significantly decreased( P〈0. 05). Conclusion There are many reasons for loss to follow-up in diabetic patients. It is necessary to strengthen the follow-up intervention for the patients,and help them to develop subjective motivation to promote behavior changes.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.147.72.3